Thursday, June 24, 2010

Movie Review: Winter’s Bone (2010)

Winter’s Bone is about a 17-year-old girl who’s forced into being the sole provider for her two younger siblings and sick mother after her father gets sent to prison for cooking up crack. Then one day Johnny Law tells her that her dad’s out of prison, that he offered up their house as collateral for his bond money, and if he doesn’t show up for his court hearing, the state takes the house and leaves her family to live out in the woods to probably die. So our girl Ree sets out on foot to every last terrifying hillbilly she’s related to (and there’s a lot of ‘em) in the hopes to get some kind of answer as to where the hell  her dad is before time runs out.
Until last week or so, I’d heard absolutely nothing about this movie, no trailers, no articles, no nothing. Then I caught wind of some utterly glowing reviews that made me feel like a jackass for being so out of the loop and finding out that it won the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance a mere four months after the fact. See, this is why some kind gent out there needs to start paying me to do this before I end up stuck in Killers for all I know. It’s just no good the way things are now.
So dry your tears if you haven’t heard of it, we all have those moments, but now that you know, get the hell out there and see this.
It’s written and directed by one Debra Granik – a woman I didn’t even know existed - and make no mistake, she is the bomb.
Being from the suburbs of New York, I can’t exactly claim to know a whole lot about living in the backwoods of the Ozarks, but apparently the sun never, ever comes out, all the trees are deader than dead and not a single resident has running water in their Shantyville showers. Granted, it is Winter, but, boy, it must totally suck to live there. But there’s a strange beauty about it, the way she embraces wide open spaces that complement the dead seriousness of the story’s tone and the way it effects the locals is ever-present and something else. This could have easily been the most grim and depressing movie setting next to the The Road, but it’s not, instead it’s authentic, fitting and mighty, mighty impressive. I like that.
Also love that Granik’s characters come off as street smart and intimidating rather than the 21st Century homicidal redneck cast of Deliverance. These folks may not have the best oral hygiene or find themselves featured on MTV Cribs any time soon, but these people – banjo parties and all - are no freakin’ joke and are shadier than you can possibly imagine.
In a nutshell, Granik has put together one seriously gritty movie and it doesn’t take long to start marveling at her keen eye for the stark and ear for the raw.
See, kids, this is how you write, this is the most refreshing damn script I’ve come across in ages. It’s such a simple plot, such a simple premise, the first half-hour is more or less comprised of our 17-year-old protagonist making home visits, and it is a thing of beauty. It’s just so uncommon to find a script anymore that feels like a throwback, where the characters don’t mince words and each sentence is packed with more meaning than most writers can get down in a fucking soliloquy, and that’s just one of the many reasons why it stands out. There is just so much power behind the dialogue and silence that even the scrawniest of individuals feel like they could feed you to the hogs without batting an eye, and even though I don’t know why Garnik is one of the minorities who can actually pull this off, she does so with ease and I’m applaud her for it.
But the real driving force behind it all is newcomer Jennifer Lawrence as our protagonist, Ree. I don’t know where this girl came from, but if she doesn’t get nominated for an Oscar this year, I will be pissed, I will be livid, I will boycott those damn awards and go to bed at a reasonable hour for once. An incredibly well-written character to begin with, Lawrence has more inherent maturity, gravitas and steadfast confidence going for her than most actors who have been in the game since she was born. I’ve never come across a girl like Ree before – which is unfortunate – and she is in all honesty right up there with Sarah Connor as one of the great badass movie heroines.
There’s also a great performance by John Hawkes as Ree’s uncle, Teardrop. Only seen him before in Deadwood, Eastbound and Down and You, Me and Everyone We Know, but the guy made quite an impression and it’s about time he landed a kickass role like this. Really good actor, really good character, and it’s about damn time people started recognizing him.
Man, I haven’t gushed over a recent movie like this in a while. I don’t know how many theaters out there are playing this at the moment, but after drudging through six long months of effing horrendous offerings from Hollywood, it is so damn good to remember what it’s like to go to a movie, love the said movie and not feel robbed of 12 hard-earned dollars. Winter’s Bone might not be your thing if you’re itching to make some feel-good memories, but it was right up my alley and I really hope it takes off. But even if it doesn’t, seek it out. The pickin’s are awful slim, gang.

“KNIGHT AND DAY” Movie Review: More Comedy, Less Action

“KNIGHT AND DAY” Movie Review: More Comedy, Less Action

Review in a Hurry: The movie Knight and Day starring  Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz is more of an old-fashioned oddball comedy rather than an action flick.

Both the stars are charming each other as well as all of us when they escape rascal government agents and global crooks. Although it could be made much better than this with less run time along with good climax.
The Bigger Picture: Tom Cruise is savvier self-marketer than the credit he gets from the people. In this feature, he smartly acts off some of the recent public perceptions about his wisdom where he is playing a man of action who may be foolish. There is a scene in which he gets enraged for how dairy products deteriorate your knees.
In the movie, Cruise plays a CIA agent whose name is Roy Miller who remain to be appealing and attractive regardless. Miller uses a gal naming June Havens playing by Diaz, who is extensively beautiful as well as expert at restoring hot rods.
She will not be suspected by the officials that’s why she’s been chosen, to secretly smuggle a top-secret item through airport security. The officials on the airport find out that June may be his partner in crime. They decided to board her on the same flight as Miller’s.
To recapture her all the time she gets away or found in the company of doubtful man Fitzgerald (Peter Sarsgaard , Miller insists that June wants to stay with him for her own safety.
They run the risk risk that either Miller is the opposite of what he says about himself or it will be impossible for them to get out of this situation alive while they were attracting to each other’s charm.
This is more of a romantic movie than tension. Miller is a total superman who mastered the Vulcan nerve pinch so there is rarely any scene in which he gets into real danger. The best part is when the action-movie model is subverted by the director James Mangold.
When June ends up drugged, all the action sequences are skipped and the only part shown in the movie is the glimpses of June that she make out while she is semi conscious.
Its tone is more like if Roger Moore’s James Bond had set up himself in a Howard awks comedy rather than Mission: Impossible. The film’s climax might have been objected by . Moore and Hawks where everything happen which could be predicted by anyone.
There is no need of spoilers because you have spoiled the story in your own mind before getting there. The 180—a Second Opinion: Its wonderful and truer thatDiaz has changed from insecure single woman to ass-kicking assistant.

 

Bloodsport Movie Review

Bloodsport Movie Review

As of the moment while writing this article, I was thinking that the movie The Last Airbender will be a huge success in cinemas worldwide. 3 Trailers and some TV spots had been released over the internet gaining thousands of views from fans which are very excited to see the movie. After the the first will come out in theaters, it will then be the sequels which fans are to get excited to.
Aang is the main character in the movie which is planned to be in Trilogy is the last of its kind as an Airbender and a monk of the Air Nomads, the only of people in which they have the power to manipulate the air around them. Aang can control all the 4 elements, Air, Water, Earth and Fire and his young age. Imagine the kids watching him will surely idolized his skills and dreaming they too should have that skills, But Aang is only a fictional character.
Aang mission to this world is to bring balance the 4 nations who is at war as the Fire Nation an imperialistic nation led by Fire Lord are engaging war to the other Nations. This Fire Nation has many colonies and are capable of engaging in to war.
The other 3 nations are asking for Aang’s help to defeat the Fire Nation and finally bring peace to this 4 nations.
t will be less than a month for the first movie to finally hit theaters worldwide, and for sure the character of Aang is the much anticipated for this film. Since its a planned trilogy, we are expecting The Last Airbender 2 as a sequel and again will make fans excited.

 

Monday, December 21, 2009

Movie Review-Crazy Heart


 Movie Review-Crazy Heart

Charles Bukowski morphs into Dewey Cox in this denunciation of the evils of paralyzing drunkenness
It was announced last Tuesday that four time Oscar nominee Jeff Bridges has copped a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor for his work in first time director Scott Cooper’s latest comedy/drama “Crazy Heart.”  Bridges plays bad Blake, the country singer with a heart full of soul and a belly full of Jack Daniels.  Trying to destroy himself with drink before the public forgets about him entirely, Blake has the peddle to the metal on a dead end road when he runs into the one person who just might turn him around.
Have we seen this before?  Rather, have we seen this before more than a thousand times?  Yes we have, but Jeff Bridges does a pretty good job at putting a new face on a very old character stereotype.  On the other hand this is the second film about the marginal redemption of washed up old men after his recent “The Men Who Stare at Goats” with George Clooney.  It would be a pity if he made this kind of maudlin self image a habit.
The person who enters his life and turns him around is one Jean Craddock played with grace and style by Maggie Gyllenhaal.  Her performance in this film is consistent with her previous work that garnered her two Golden Globes, “SherryBaby’ in 2006 and “Secretary” in 2002.  On the other hand she doesn’t have a lot to do.  She plays the understanding, stunningly beautiful girl next door who falls in love with the purified alcoholic old enough to be her father.  What else is new?  After she summoned up the courage to go through with the character the acting must have been simple.
Colin Farrell has a small but well played part as Tommy Sweet, the successful country rock star who was once Blake’s protégé.  Sweet has passed up Blake on the road to success because Blake is a drunken incompetent slob and Sweet is a rational person.  So if viewers know any drunken incompetent slobs who are losing out to rational persons this would be a good film to recommend.
The Jeff Bridges fans out there will se him whenever they can.  Few of us will forget him in the “The Big Lebowski” which continues to show up on the “best performances” lists and will for years to come.  Having said that, this film is no Lebowski.  The character of Bad Blake is supposed to embody the soul and pathos of Matt Dillon’s Henry Chinaski (“Factotum,” 2005) which channels the drunken legend Charles Bukowski, the gold standard of the modern American who truly, deeply and sincerely does not give a shit.  Unfortunately, we can’t get the memory of John C. Reilly in “Walk Hard” out of our minds and Dewey Cox keeps creeping in where Bukowski is supposed to be.
So far there are only two good drunk performances in film, Lemmon in “Days of Wine and Roses” and Milland in “Lost Weekend.”  The key is the sense of dirty secrecy about the addiction; it is not necessary for the actor to vomit onto the camera.  Whether it’s the screenplay, the direction, or the fact that Jeff Bridges is just too cool a guy, this film doesn’t pull it off.  The result is a flick about a reforming alcoholic instead of a film about a person.
As hard as one tries to get into the chemistry between Maggie Gyllenhaal and Bridges, it isn’t there.  There is nothing in the screenplay to support a knockout like her going for a guy like him.  Great to see Robert Duvall again but he is wasted in this film; seeing him just makes one want to rent “Great Santini” or “Lonesome Dove” again.  There is no such thing as a bad Jeff Bridges movie, but this is not his shining hour.
Directed by: Scott Cooper
Written by: Scott Cooper (screenplay) Thomas Cobb (novel)

Starring: Jeff Bridges and Maggie Gyllenhaal
Release: December 16, 2009
MPAA: Rated R for language and brief sexuality
Runtime: 111 minutes
Country: USA
Language: English
Color: Color


Saturday, December 12, 2009

Movie review: Up in the Air

Movie review: Up in the Air

Starring: George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, Jason Bateman
Opens Friday at: AMC cinema.
Parents’ guide: language.

Beware the elevated expectations that may accompany Up in the Air.
The collaboration between hot writer-director Jason Reitman (Juno, Thank You for Smoking) and George Clooney (of George Clooney fame) has been highly anticipated and praised to the skies in early reviews.
But this very contemporary dramatic comedy is both more and less than the sum of its raves.
Clooney is Ryan Bingham, a man who works for a firm that fires people so their own companies won’t have to face the ugly truth of what they’re doing to human lives.

Though his outfit is based in Omaha and he nominally lives there himself, Bingham spends 322 days a year travelling and “43 miserable days at home” – if the soulless apartment he rents could possibly be called home.
Bingham travels for a living. His most prized possession is his frequent-flyer card, his ultimate goal being 10 million miles and membership in an exclusive club.

Up in the Air was shot in the early, dire economic months of this year, and it is to Reitman’s credit that he chose real, recently terminated people to react to Bingham’s news they’d just been let go. The job market is bad for them, but good for Bingham and his amoral boss, Jason Bateman’s Craig Gregory. It’s the “worst time,” he says cheerily. “This is our moment.”

Bingham lives for his perks, and the hotels and airports he negotiates so well while others fume. So it’s only fitting he meet his female professional equivalent over drinks in a hotel bar. Her name is Alex (Vera Farmiga, so good in Breaking and Entering, and The Departed). What she does for a living is not stated, but it involves travel, itineraries, computers and cellphones. When they hook up, they plot their next assignation by comparing skeds on laptops.

Taking their paperless universe one step further, Gregory wants Bingham to meet Natalie (Anna Kendrick), a crackerjack new employee who’s come up with a way to streamline the business. Why waste time and money travelling when you can climb on a teleconferencing system and can people over the phone?
Bingham responds like a man defending his life, which is no distance from the truth. He loves his rootless, privileged existence. He also holds some old-school credence to wrecking lives in person. So he takes Natalie along to show her what it is he really does.

Up in the Air is the curious hybrid of modern cautionary tale and shimmery Hollywood comedy. It is well-written, well-acted, by turns funny, rueful and a kick in the head. It gives Clooney an opportunity to show the full range of the substantial talents he has displayed in movies from Ocean’s Eleven to Syriana, and has the good sense to make Alex both a real woman and Bingham’s rootless mirror image.

But in the end, as he looks at the departure board in another nameless airport, an earlier reference to him comes to mind. “It was just somebody who’s lost.” Can an audience’s hopes hang by such a slim existential thread?

Movie Review: Up In The Air

Movie Review: Up In the Air (2009) – RopeofSilicon.com Movie News, Tr..

The Rumpus Review Of Up In The Air - The Rumpus.net

Review:  Up in the Air (2009) «  The Entertainment Blur

"Up In the Air" Review: George Clooney, Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick star..

Review St. Louis |   “Up in the Air” Scores 6 Golden Globe Nomi..

Movie Review: Up in the Air « The Culture Beat

REVIEW: Reitman’s ‘Up in the Air’ Built With Award Season In Mind, No..

Movie Review: ‘Up In The Air’

UP IN THE AIR (2009): A Review at Blast-O-Rama

Up In the Air | The Life and Art of Vern

Movie Review: UP IN THE AIR | GeekTyrant

Review: Up in the Air «  Gone Elsewhere

Movie Review:  Up in the Air (2009) | The Critical Critics Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Up In the Air « Lobo’s Rants

Golden Globes 2010! Movie Review

Review: UP IN THE AIR | We Are Movie Geeks

Movie Review: UP IN THE AIR, with Notes from Q & A with Jason Reitman a..

Mileopoly  » Blog Archive   » Up in the Air (movie review by a ..

Movie Review: Up in the Air | Tobacco Facts.

UP IN THE AIR movie review - TFC Journal

Entertainment News Blog - Celebrity Movies Music Television »        ..

Quick Movie Review: “Up in the Air” « THE BLARG

My Votes on the Best Movies, Actors, Etc. in 2009

Once underdog, director Jason Reitman adjusts to role of Oscar favorite wit..

Up in the Air Review - Watch this Charmer; Screw the Bachcha-ns

New Movie Releases Movie Trailers New Movies on DVD Movies Online

Up in the Air, Brothers, Armored – Movie Reviews

Up in the Air Movie Review | Movie Reviews - Judge By Reviews

Up in the Air – English Movie Review | Cinefundas.com - One Stop Cine..

How to Give “Air,” “Nine” Some Globes Love « ..

Friday, December 4, 2009

Movie Review:-Everybody’s Fine

Movie Review:-Everybody’s Fine

Everybody’s Fine stars Robert De Niro as a retired gentleman in his 60’s who recently lost his wife. He is expecting his four adult children to spend the weekend at his house. He cuts his lawn, cleans the house, buys a new bbq to grill the big steaks he bought to go along with an expensive bottle of wine he purchased. Then he checks the answering machine – his two daughters have called to confirm that they and their two brothers were all too busy to go to his house that weekend. So Frank Goode, against the wishes of his doctor, sets out on a cross-country journey to visit his diverse and successful children and get the update as to what is going on in their lives.

He begins in New York, where David is an artist living in an apartment above the gallery that displays his art. Then there is the beautiful Amy (Kate Beckinsale), an advertising executive who lives in a beautiful house in a Chicago suburb with her husband and young son. Robert (Sam Rockwell) is a musician in an orchestra and lives in Denver. Finally, Frank makes his way to Las Vegas where Rosie (Drew Barrymore) is a professional dancer living in a beautiful apartment that overlooks Sin City.
As Frank’s journey unfolds, he learns more about his children and probably about himself. I get the feeling the kids learned a bit about their pops too. It is certainly an eye-opening and emotional experience for everyone involved.
That is the basic story of Everybody’s Fine. I have to say the first 45 minutes of the movie moved at a slow pace and I was really wondering where this film was going. I didn’t know much about the story and the trailer seemed to indicate that it was going to be a comedy. Based on some of De Niro’s past endeavors – the Focker movies, Analyze This and That, Showtime, Stardust – that is what I was expecting. However, Everybody’s Fine ended up being a rather serious and heartfelt tearjerker. I felt quite emotional at the end of the movie
as De Niro’s character tried to connect with his children and showed them that the old man had a thing or two up his sleeve. I absolutely loved the last 30 minutes. His analysis of each of his children kind of came out of left field. It was a very heart-warming moment.
With that being said, I am pretty sure that Everybody’s Fine is not a movie everyone will enjoy. The “New Moon” crowd and the “Ninja Assassin” group are sure to see it as nothing more than an excessively sentimental melodrama. For me, I really liked how the family and family values came to a head at the end of the movie. I liked how Frank Goode accepted his children despite any shortcomings he might have discovered. This movie made me smile despite the fact that it had no humans falling in love with vampires and then cheating on them with werewolves. Maybe it would have been nice if there were a ninja or two. Nevertheless, it was a nice change for De Niro to play what I thought was a pretty suitable and subtle role for him. Like everybody in the movie, my summary of this movie is it’s just fine. (8 out of 10)

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Theatrical Review:-New Moon

Theatrical Review:-New Moon
New Moon is one of those movies for which the plot is almost superfluous. If you are a fan of Twilight, you more or less know it. If you are not, you probably do not care.  However, for form's sake, I will sum it up.

New Moon comes in as the second installment in the Twilight, the Stephanie Meyer series. It is about a love affair between a vampire, Edward Cullen, played by Robert Pattinson and a human high school student, Bella, Kristen Stewart.  In the first movie, she discovered Cullen's secret that he is a vampire; and they fell in love.  In this installment, after she gets a paper cut at a birthday party and Cullen's vampire-family almost kills her, he goes into self-imposed exile, breaks her heart, and leaves her with the super-built-up Jacob Black, Taylor Lautner, with 26 added pounds of muscle that he put on trying to reprise his role from the first movie. He turns out to be a werewolf -- the natural enemy of the vampire.

As Bella pines for Edward, she keeps the love-struck Jacob around because, (a) he is totally into her, and (b) she has discovered that adrenaline rushes give her a psychic connection to Edwards. She likes doing dangerous things like cliff diving and racing dirt-bikes.  In the meantime, angry vampress, Victoria (from the first movie) makes recurring raids on the town trying to find and kill Bella. She is chased by the werewolf pack while Cullen decides that if she dies he will kill himself.

Finally something happens to make him think she died, and she actually almost does. Things come to a head as she tries to stop him from killing himself like Romen as he does not want to live without her.  It is meant to be very romantic in a decidedly gothic sort of way, and I suppose it is.

So how is it?  Well, it delivers the male cheesecake.  It delivers the pining heroine.  It delivers the moody, rainy Washington State.  It delivers bear-sized werewolves who chase down super-fast vampires.  It delivers product placement when, again, Cullen drives a domestic Volvo instead of a bad-boy's hot-rod.  Judging from its numbers, it satisfied the legions of Twilight fans and who am I to tell them they are wrong?

Before we get to spoiler territory and commentary, let me weigh in with this.  It appears that the problem with Twilight and New Moon (in particular) is not that it is bad.  It is not stupid or artless.  There is a scene where the super fast wolves are chasing the vampire, who is also super fast). We see them moving at normal sprinting speeds at the same time a bird seen from overhead moves with a wing-flap every few seconds.  Then it speeds up to 'real-time' with a kinetic blur of motion.  This is very good stuff, but there is a battle at the end where two super-fast vampires fight each other; we get sort of a into-and-out-of-bullet-time battle in which Cullen (who is a tough, if average vampire) gets to fight a bad-ass personal guardian of vampire aristocracy who, rightly, dominates him. The movie also gets that right; and after watching a lot of these types of things, that is not necessarily an easy thing to do.

If you are a fan, the problem with Twilight is that it is hugely self-indulgent. Bella mistreats her friends, but they all still love her.  The vampires, rather than being dark and dangerous, are all sparkly.  The love affair is painfully chaste with each of them pining for the other in a whirlwind of angst. Is it coincidence that the class lecture is Romeo and Juliet -- of course not.  How far does the movie have to go in order to ensure that two sets of monsters will battle over Bella's heart -- even as both vie for the right to stand guard over her -- not very far at all.  So far, this is a series that caters lovingly to its protagonist -- who, it is alleged, is a stand-in for author, Stephanie Meyer; and to my eye, seems like one.


Bella is the luckiest girl in the world. Her father is bewildered by her angst and depression, but never loses his patience with her. When she demands no presents for her birthday, of course she is showered with gifts.  When she decides after a lengthy exile to sit at the lunch table with the un-cool kids -- the uber-cool kids, the Cullens, have left town -- they immediately accept her back; and she gets a date instantly, although she does not necessarily want one. The poor kid who asked her out gets taken to an action flick since she wants an adrenaline rush and winds up throwing up in the bathroom ... before being almost mauled by Jacob.
The movie plays like a drama-laden, 14-year-old's dream relationship and seems to me as all desert and no dinner.  In my mind, it does nothing to earn any loyalty to its protagonist.  She has everything, and yet she is perpetually miserable -- so let's talk about spoilers.

Spoilers
The movie sets up a love triangle between Jacob who wants Bella and Bella, who wants Cullen. Cullen, wants Bella but is afraid he or his family will kill her -- after all, she is full of tasty blood.  Jacob and Cullen, also being mortal vampire/werewolf enemies, hate each other on the principal of ... I guess ... racism.  Or, possibly Jacob hates the Cullens because vegetarian vampires or not, their kind kill people, and presumably even the noble Cullen-clan has slipped up once in a while.

On the other hand, the movie tells us that sometimes werewolves accidentally kill people too; so maybe we are just back to monsterism.  I can not be sure.

The key thing is that Bella uses Jacob.  It is true that eventually she does tell him there is no chance, but she doesn't want him to stop wanting her because she is selfish. In one sense, this discussion has integrity; she lays out for him that she plans to string him along, and if he is okay with that, she likes it because, let's face it, he doesn't have a chance -- her true love is Edwards.


However, on the other hand, I think we, as the audience, are expected to identify with Bella over this decision. After all, she's the heroine. The movie doesn't seem to find her Edwards-left-me nightmares overly dramatic. When Jacob stops returning her calls, not because he's had it with her--but because he's afraid he might hurt her in his wolf form--and she goes looking for him--I think we as the audience are expected to want to see them together.

Instead, this dynamic, confession made Bella the predator in the relationship. She knows he is infatuated with her; knows that she can use him to dull the pain of Edwards having left; knows it will eventually hurt him more and seeks him out relentlessly. Having her acknowledge that she is selfish is one thing, but having her perspective on being selfish be, essentially, validated by the movie is something else.  For me, it was one step of self-indulgence too far.  If the author, and director, and so on, actually does have contempt for the behavior of the protagonist, they certainly do not show it. I believe, since the appeal of Twilight is predicated on the protagonist being wanted and loved by all and the headaches that brings, I simply believe the various authorial voices find this situation to be due Bella.

This left a bad taste in my mouth.
End Spoilers
I have a hard time rating this movie because I didn't very much like its take on the subject matter of vampires and werewolves, but I did like how it brought it to us.  I did not like the main character, but I appreciated her performance.  I haven't read the books, but it seems that the creators of the film did a good job with the material.  However, in the end, despite a somewhat slow middle, it held my attention all the way through.  For that, I think I have to give it the benefit of the doubt.